Support #390

how to deal with inapplicable values

Added by Jun Liu over 5 years ago. Updated almost 5 years ago.

Data documentation
Target version:
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:


Estimated time:


Dear support team
a lot of the variables in the Understanding Society dataset has a high percentage of inapplicable values. For example, the highest qualification variable, w_qfhigh, has around 85-90% of inapplicable values. How should I deal with the inapplicable values? Is inapplicable values the same as missing values? why is a variable like the highest qualification has so many inapplicable values? I would assume most of the people in the sample has some kind of education. Any other inputs on the questions will be much appreciated.

Thank you 


#1 Updated by Gundi Knies over 5 years ago

  • Category set to Data documentation
  • Assignee set to Gundi Knies
  • % Done changed from 0 to 90

Dear Jun,
we differentiate between a number of different sources of missingness. The full listing is reported in Table 19 of the Understanding Society User Guide (2014).

You will see in the questionnaire routing that _qfhigh is only asked when a respondent first enters the study, hence the large number of [-8 missing] from Wave 2 onward. Differences between _qfhigh and _qfhigh_dv are explained in the variable level descriptions of the respective variables. _qfhigh_dv is a derived variable and the variable level description includes references to which variables are used in its construction. See, for example:

Hope this helps,

#2 Updated by Gundi Knies over 5 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Resolved
  • % Done changed from 90 to 100
  • Private changed from No to Yes

#3 Updated by Gundi Knies over 5 years ago

  • Private changed from Yes to No

#4 Updated by Gundi Knies about 5 years ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Closed

#5 Updated by Gundi Knies almost 5 years ago

  • Target version set to X M

Also available in: Atom PDF